jump to navigation

A Rap Session with Rickey Powell 05/24/2011

Posted by Vaughn in Art, Editorial, Global Street Culture, Interviews, Journalism, Media, Street Brands, Youth Culture.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Photo Credit: Format Magazine

Editor’s Note:

WRITING has its perks. You get to sit in the corner with your nose in the air and snicker at Joe-Blow-six-pack, a lot of times; whose sense of humor could use a tune-up, sense of art is less than refined, and whose conversation band usually covers only family troubles and the droll of worker-bee life. Basically, they’ve given up on living. Kidding. (Generalizations, here, people, generalizations!)

With writing, you also sometimes get to have your questions answered by cats who’ve lived a colorful life and experienced, participated and contributed in the springing of a subculture that has touched everything from popular culture, fashion, to politics.

I had an opportunity to have the famed music and hip-hop culture photographer, Rickey Powell, answer some of my questions, a couple of years ago, and not knowing exactly what I wanted to ask, these questions (below) are what came to my mind, before I sent them into my very first editor for final approval. Naturally, I asked about basketball — I mean, really, this is not Cracker Jack decoder ring and cipher stuff — and Golden Era hip-hop things.

I believe, it ended up being a fairly good representation of Powell’s iconoclastic streak, particularly when he decides to put Knicks’ owner, James Dolan, on blast. (I wonder what Powell thinks about the additions of STAT and ‘Melo?) Anyway, I hope you enjoy it.

Is there a photograph that you’ve taken, you feel defines your body of work?

Well, that’s a little hard to single out because I think I shot a couple of “classics” from different areans; like my photo of Andy Warhol and Jean Michel Basquiat on their way to that famous, historic duo show at Shafrazi gallery in Soho, in the spring of ‘85 — I was actually hangin’ out with graff’s “Dynamic Duo,” Zephyr and Revolt, when I skedaddled across the street to take the shot, quick-like, (I asked first, of course), and they graciously paused for a moment, and then preceded the mob scene 50-feet behind me — that would contend with being the most definable.

As well as the sleeve shot from the Beastie Boys album Paul’s Boutique, the underwater shot, from the rented house in the Hollywood Hills called “The G Spot” — named after the Grasshoffs, an older married couple whose home it was and who’s closet they [The Beastie Boys] would raid for things such as the “Hey Ladies” video, or to get in the mood for those late-night recording sessions for ‘Boutique.

Oh, one more: Certainly, “Sly,” the Husky I walked for someone in 1985. We — me and Sly — had a great friendship. I loved that dog; loved walking him around the West Village, by the Hudson River. I photographed him in the elevator once, that spring, which was when I actually proclaimed that I was going to get into photography as a serious life long “career,” and I put that image in a lot of my different projects/products.

You were a substitute teacher between legendary hip-hop tours for some time. How did that help with gaining the respect and attention of the kids?

Yes, I was a real-deal certifiable substitute teacher for the N.Y.C. Board of Ed., between 1987 and 1991. It was a good gig for a while, but I retired from it because I can’t work a real job, even one where you can come to work whenever you feel like it, work a six-hour day with two periods off in-between, and basically just let the kids loose in the yard for last period.

Anyway, yeah, I used go on business trips (rap tours) a lot between the years of 1986 and 1988, of different lengths, the most with the Beasties, of course, but then I would get gigs with groups like Run D.M.C., L.L Cool J, Public Enemy , Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince, E.P.M.D. and the like, and when I was back home in N.Y, I would sub. Now, of course, I know how subs get abused; I used to do it. But when I walked in with a fresh Adidas suit and bangin’ kicks, the kids were thrown off a bit.

The first thing I would tell them is, “You wanna be cool, we’ll be cool… You wanna act stupid, I can get stupid with you.” Then I would ask/tell the class to come over to the windows, as I would pull slide sheets full of photos of all the biggest rap stars of the day, out of my attache case, hold them up to the window, and the class would start bugging as I would tell them about my adventures/encounters with groupies. One of my hoodies put out by Altamont has a photo of a kid in the Ps.41 schoolyard in 1986, and it’s captioned: “Ricky Powell Street Photography by the ‘Cool Substitute Teacher.’ “

What’s your connection to Lush Life N.Y.C.?

Lush Life is my good buddy, Ryan Sikorski’s, brand. We hang, but sometimes we collaborate; like he’ll put an image of mine on a product of his like a skateboard, t-shirt and even coffee mugs. We got some cool shit coming later this year and next. He also helps mediate some of my business matters, like a big trip I have in Japan in, like, mid-October; we’re taking my “Illy Funksters” exhibit that was just up at MILK Gallery in N.Y. He’s bringing his girl DJ Elle, and I’m bringing my assistant/personal photographer/traveling companion/confidante/and protege Tracey X.  I’m looking forward to the trip, they [the Japanese] think I’m Bruce Willis. I don’t know, I just go along with it, maybe I’ll get some free gear, you know…



Do you have a favorite old-school hip-hop record?

That’s another one hard to pin down, but I like KRS-One’s [he actually means Boogie Down Productions] Criminal Minded very much, as well as his next album, what’s the name of that one? [By All Means Necessary.] But, you know, I’m also a little partial to the Raising Hell album by Run Dmc. “Peter Piper” is classic.

As a documenter and, at the time, an unknowing architect of hip-hop culture in media circles, what are your reflections on hip-hop’s path and future?

Well, hip-hop/rap has different eras. I found it interesting in the ’80’s, [early, mid and late]. I liked the Wu-Tang Clan in the early-to-mid ’90’s, but after that I lost interest. It became, “It’s for kids,” to me. I think it’s awful now, has been this whole “New Millennium!” It’s way played out to me, the shit they rap about doesn’t interest me in the least. I’m not intentionally dissin’, but it [the music] speaks for itself. I moved on. I mainly listen to jazz, funk, jazzy funk, funky jazz, rock (from the ’50’s to the ’70’s), blues and the oldies. I love the oldies, doo-wop and what not.

Can you talk a bit about Upper Playground’s The Citrus Report and your involvement in that?

Well I’ve been down with Upper Playground since 2000, and I would do anything for Matt Rivelli, the chief. He’s a solid dude and he’s supported [me] during some of my leanest times, I love him like a family member. So when he had Evan Pricco from Juxtapoz Magazine ask me to write my column for their new online mag called “The Citrus Report,” I was down. I liked the name. I like how my first two installments have been presented. It’s all good with them.

Who was your favorite Knicks’ squad?

My favorite Knicks’ squad? Hmm, that’s a good one. Well, of course, I’m partial to the two (and only) Championship teams from ‘69-’70 and the ‘72-’73 team. The ‘70 team’s starting lineup had Willis Reed, Dave Debusschere, Bill Bradley, Walt Frazier and Dick Barnett. They were dope athletically, but intellectual as well, they loved how they were all from vastly different worlds but gelled, coagulated in such a way, that they were captivating, compelling, riveting.

I was a little [too] young at the time to really understand them, but as I got older I understood. The ‘73 teamed had Earl Monroe in place of the retired Barnett, this was a special squad mainly because of the way Earl “The Pearl” Monroe adjusted his game to coincide with Frazier’s. They worked it beautifully. I was in sixth grade when they won it in the spring of ‘73, and I was all up in that series, ask me anything.

By the way, I interviewed legendary photographer George Kalinsky — the official photographer for Madison Square garden since 1966 — for Interview Magazine earlier this year, it should be out in September/October. It better be. He’s sumthin’ else, I grew up with his pictures on my walls of wherever I lived. It was mesmerizing to look through old programs (game-day magazines) with him and listen to inside anecdotes.

One thing, when the fuck are they going to raise Bernard King’s “30″ to the rafters!?!? Oh, one more thing, owner, James Dolan, is The Duke of Dorks and a fuck’n putz. He’s “The-Thing-That-Won’t-Leave” — even though he knows he’s not wanted [and] hated, I can’t stand that; those types. I recently had a perpetratin’ hag like that removed from an opening I D.J.’d. Some people just can’t take a hint and keep it movin’.

Let us in on with what’s good with Rappin’ with the Rickster?

Rappin’ with the Rickster — which premiered on Manhattan Public Access T.V. in August of 1990 — has gone through several phases over the years. I currently have a 10-minute installment episode on my profile page on MySpace (Ricky Powell). [Since down.]  I like to interview people who have been in Greenwich Village for a long time, that’s where I’m going with it, being like a “village historian,” somebody from my crew gotta step up. I’ve got a classic one coming up, it’s still in my mind, but the combination of guests is going to be stimulating [to] viewers.

Visit Ricky Powell’s site [Here]

Occasional Superstar’s ‘The Race Card’ 11/09/2008

Posted by Vaughn in Art, Interviews, Journalism, Politics.
comments closed

Editor’s Note:

I was given the opportunity about a year ago, to talk to a young artist that was working on some projects that brought social dynamics and racial politics to the art scene in various pieces. The pre-interview story from my editor was that this artist, Fabian Williams, otherwise known as the “Occasional Superstar,” who had done some work with his fellow Atlantans and seminal ’90s hip-hop duo and Southern rap vanguard OutKast, had produced an actual deck of “race cards” to employ in various social situations, when warranted. One deck was for situations where white people had been afflicted with the politics and the other: for blacks who had been similarly exposed. The fact that the concept was highly entertaining and more than just a bit sensational amid the dominance of the cross-your-fingers, disingenuous tolerance of political correctness; and that Fabian is an artist of merit, noting how many bandy about the term “artist” like a Nerf Screamer circa 1993, intrigued me. What follows is my remote interview with Fabian, and a look at his project known as “The Race Card.”

RACE is perhaps America’s most thorny walk-on-egg-shells, “let’s agree to disagree, in order to be civil and avoid an all-out brawl from happening,”-type issue. In a conversation where stereotypes, history and emotions muddle the discussion, one needs a mechanism for honesty. So what better way is there to discuss race in America, than making a literal and employable “race card,” and therefore removing any subtlety and nuance, whilst providing the opportunity of physically flinging it at offenders, as a form of confrontation, when necessary? Funny, right?

Now, depending on your nature (non-confrontational, confrontational, or just plain “crazy”) this may seem like a genius idea, or a disaster waiting to strike on the horizon. Since my nature tends to lean somewhere between confrontational and out-and-out “crazy,” I happen to believe that removing any of the social pleasantries from the discussion may be what is needed and graphic designer and arm-chair sociologist, Fabian Williams, the mastermind behind a set of cards called ‘The Race Card,” which features such controversial figures as Bill O’Reilly and Al Sharpton, is one to agree. So I decided to have a little chit-chat with the man behind what I call a “Genius Deck.”

So, Fabian, tell us about the origins and motivations behind this particular project of your’s and its companion Web site…

It all started one day, when I was having a discussion with some guys in the office where I was working at the time in Atlanta. We were talking about what we thought was the most racist movie ever. From my point of view, it was King Kong. They were shocked because they didn’t see the racism in it. I explained to them that there were some suspicious metaphors operating in that movie: [A] giant, savage, black gorilla surrounded by natives; has an obsession with blondes. I thought it was the white man’s fear of the black man’s strength and prowess: a big, savage black man chasing after and tainting the pure, fragile white woman; ironic because it was usually the white woman that was obsessed with what she thought a black man could do.

And just like most blacks at that time period who would dare deal with a white woman, King Kong met with a violent death. After making that argument, with some sound bites from Brown vs. Board of Education, it was agreed that my point of view was valid. Soon after that, my coworker, Cliff Fretwell, placed a piece of paper on my desk with an ‘R’ on the corners and Al Sharpton’s face on it. He gave me a “Race Card” to play on people, whenever I had a point to make about a racial situation. A light bulb went on in my head…

Race is an issue that is played up for laughs by comedians and many people within ethnic communities, and even outside of them, and humor is honestly a vehicle for discussion. Does the Race Card project fall into this category of using comedy to elicit discussion?

It’s definitely a mechanism to lighten the mood about a serious subject. Most racism today is subtle, so I figured what better way to put it out there than a sort of referee flag. It’s like when you’re watching a football game, and you don’t see anything wrong but you see the ref drop the penalty flag. Then you watch the replay and realize; “oh, somebody got violated.” You have to call it out. Otherwise, it goes unnoticed. Then you have riots.

Are you at all worried that this project may rub some people of a more politically correct disposition the wrong way?

It definitely depends on the user. I use the Race Card to bring the issue to the forefront, but make it funny. I like to act like I just scored a touch down to make light of the point. We laugh but at the same time, I’m making a point, “Watch that…”

Can you explain the reasoning behind the figures you use on the card faces?

After much conversation with my peers, I decided to use Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson because when it comes to racial issues, let’s face it, these two come to mind. I figure it’s a way to take the power of Al and Jesse with you. The funny thing is, news networks complain about Sharpton and Jackson, but always call them when something goes down. Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly are never called “race hustlers,” but always offer their opinions and view points of the conservative base, which I translate: as the Christian white male. I thought if there were going to be a white card, those two would be the ones to represent the argument from the other side. I almost picked Sean Hannity, but I decided on Rush at the last minute.

Now, how does one use these cards in a “situation”?

If a white guy comes to you and says, “‘Bro (brother), you’re cool, you’re not like most black people.” You could then say, “Oh, thank you. You mean I’m not like the rest of those niggas, thanks for noticing. Here, you hold on to this.” You hand them the card and you walk away.

Is this as tongue-in-cheek as it seems, or does it come from a place of real desire to confront in a new way? (Regardless of any actual and possible card flinging.)

Absolutely. Today’s racism is covert and a little difficult to discuss. The Race Card brings a lighthearted element to the arena. The only way to get rid of it is to bring it out in the open and dismiss it.

Are there any future projects that you would like to tell us about, that are as novel or of the same vein? A board game, perhaps?

No board game, but I do have plans for a gay card, a Latino card, a line of playing cards based on illustrations I did of the 2008 presidential candidates, and a line of hip-hop themed cards called The Deck, that I concepted initially right after Tupac passed in 1997. I am finally getting around to finishing it. Guaranteed, you’ve seen nothing like it. You can get The Race Card at racecard.tv, for now. Look for the Great Debate in the next month and The Deck soon after.

For more information on Fabian and his projects [Here]

For more on “The Race Card” [Here]

‘On GI Joe’ 09/18/2008

Posted by Vaughn in Interviews, Journalism, Marketing, Media, Profiles, Youth Culture.
comments closed

Editor’s Note:

I have been a G.I. Joe fanatic since I was a very, very little kid. (I even blogged about my history with the toy, once before, and the Blood for the Baron repository of its Action Force comics origins.) G.I. Joes were my escape from the world as an only child with a lot of free time. I would often hole up in my room for hours at times, arranging scenes and battles placing the figures in full armament compliment on the pegs of their vehicles. At night, the best of “my guys” defended me against the shadows in the darkened room and long hallway between my room and my parents’. “Joe” would also end up in my father’s flight-suit pockets during what I felt were particularly bleaker foreign policy times, as a kid. My own countermeasures system. (If Hit & Run was in Pop’s pocket, they both had to come back home.)

The 3 3/4 series of “Joe” were talismans and personal effects for me, accompanying me to all family road trips, class (Mrs. Gray gave me a lot of latitude) and social functions. I used to even read and commit to memory, before going to bed, the data on the file cards that were attached to their classic bubble packaging, telling the expertise of the particular character and their biography, which fully immersed me into the world and the significant mythology surrounding the franchise that spans from movies to lunch boxes.

So it was a logical progression for me to tap the personal, for a printed piece I wrote recently. The piece looks at the cultural legacy of G.I. Joe and its spanning multiple generations of boys’ toy experience. “Yo Joe!” was a piece that was begging to be written, because of its significance to my story. I learned to read four levels above my grade level in some small part because of those file cards and the fertility of my imagination grew out of playing with the toy. You are continually told to “write what you know” in university composition courses. This was the ultimate “writing what I know” and eventually what I didn’t know. The second part of the piece is a companion Q&A with avid collector Michael Domaguing, a friend of the magazine’s editor.

Yo Joe!: A Look at the Cultural Footprint of GI Joe

WHEN Hasbro re-released the G.I. Joe action figure in1982 (in 3 ¾ inch form) under the “A Real American Hero” line, after the original had been off of the shelves for years; no one, not even Hasbro, could have expected it to have become as big as it did. Piggy-backing off of G.I. Joe’s parallel universes in the U.K. Battle Action Force comics and its stateside comic book counterpart (that shared the same “A Real American Hero” name as the toy line), as well as the success of the forerunning 12-inch G.I. Joe doll known as “America’s Moveable Fighting Man,” the 3 ¾ inch action-figure raised a generation of young boys on the battle between Good versus Evil.

Originally released in 1964 and developed by Stan Weston (the original 12-inch doll was his idea) and Don Levine, then the creative director at Hasbro, the G.I. Joe doll was the very first indication that a “boys’ doll” market even existed. Between 1964 and 1978, the original, mostly 12-inch G.I. Joe line, went through two re-interpretations from its military form. Hasbro responded to sensitivities to the Vietnam War and charted a more adventure-based path for “Joe,” and later, it moved the toy into outer space as a smaller 8 ½ inch doll called “Super Joe.” Over that time, G.I. Joe was a latent force for multiculturalism; introducing minority figures, first in selected cities, particularly an African-American version, and then nationally with its Super Joe and Super Joe commander lines. (Later, the line would feature prominent Native-American and Asian- American characters.) In the 1980s, the toyline displayed gender equality in its 3 ¾ series lineup by producing many strong female characters from Lady Jay to Scarlett, to Baroness and Covergirl.

By the time 1982 hit and the “A Real American Hero” 3 ¾ toy released, G.I. Joe’s 12-inch cousin that was based on “general issue” historic military archetypes such as the Marine, the pilot and sailor was fully adopted into the mainstream, and the market for poseable figures for boys was no longer an unknown quantity in the toy business. Also by 1982, a more appealing and masculine gender term had surfaced to replace the old moniker of “doll.” The term was “action figure,” and it had hit the parlance. 1982 also brought the release of the G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero cartoon that coincided with the comic book series and toy. The animated series was the beginning of the purely product tie-in children’s program that developed and flourished in the 1980s. It was a system where children’s morning television became the breeding ground for acculturation into consumerism, and where a toy generally begat licensed apparel, licensed apparel begat accessories and school supplies, and all begat a movie and video game, if lucky.

Not that there’s anything wrong with such unabashed youth consumerism since it is, partially, the lifeblood of an economy. And Hasbro took that consumerism seriously and if you were a “Joe fan” coming up, you were well aware of this. Between the two toy bases that were produced, an aircraft carrier, and an arrayed offering of vehicles and characters (that like the car industry was updated yearly), the G.I. Joe 3 ¾ toy was an economic monster that was able to print its own money. Within five years, the G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero franchise had burrowed itself into the consciousness of boys and it became the laser-blasting toy du jour, along with Star Wars and Transformers. The success of the toy was, in part, the result of the mythology that the cartoon and comic were able to create; getting young boys to both follow and desire to recreate the toy’s television and comic book storylines.

This interest in the G.I. Joe mythology was enough to lead to G.I. Joe: The Movie, which was a straight-to-video release that to this day, holds a soft-spot in most ’80s boys’ hearts. The movie, much like the animated series, brought the introduction of several new characters that were not seen in the original 1982-1986 cartoon episodic, then already in its fourth season. Introducing the characters of Jinx, Tunnel Rat, Lieutenant Falcon, Law, Sergeant Slaughter’s Renegades and others, G.I. Joe: The Movie was the peak of G.I. Joe’s ascendance. While characters: Snake Eyes, Duke, Storm Shadow, Cobra Commander and Destro represented the original generation of G.I. Joe in the 3 ¾ form and in the cartoon and comic, the new characters of the 1987 team marked the dividing line in the G.I. Joe 3 ¾ inch series, between its old school and new school, with updates to the appearances of many of its original 1982 characters soon after.

The success of the G.I. Joe toy line and cartoon cannot be spoken of without the mentioning of the cartoon and toys’ parallel to real military forces and technology. From characters like Lifeline (a medic), to Mainframe (a computer specialist), to Beachhead (an Army Ranger), to the vehicles that were featured in dramatic motion in the cartoon, the “Joe” universe replicated or implied existing military technology and roles, or a very plausible military future. It is even believed within some of the G.I. Joe collecting community that the migration of the toys from the more realistic military interpretations seen in its earlier series, to the more exotic and futuristic elements that were seen in the latter part of the line, hurt the sales of the G.I. Joe toy in the 1990s, and eventually it saw its discontinuation in 1994.

Since the ‘90s, the G.I. Joe toy and cartoon has seen its ups and downs, and several attempts at giving the franchise a much-needed shot in the arm such as G.I. Joe: Sigma 6, which began airing in 2005 and used the same cartoon and toy product tie-in as the original A Real American Hero series. For a small period of time in the ‘90s, before the toy’s end, the incorporation of Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter characters into the toyline was another ploy used to trump up flagging sales. Though Hasbro and G.I. Joe were no stranger to such a situation, during the late ‘80s the franchise faced a similar fate as the cartoon was off the air for some time. Eventually, the animated series’ rights were purchased by Dic from Sunbow, the company that originally produced the G.I. Joe: Real American Hero series, and the franchise was re-aired and invigorated.

In 2007, the 3 ¾ toy celebrated its 25th Anniversary and reminiscent collectors’ packs sold well to the generation who grew up watching the series and purchasing the figures and vehicles. And of course, G.I. Joe’s presence in the comic book and toy-collecting scene has seen little tapering. The fond memories of the anti-terrorist force filled with characters of unmatched specialties still reigns in the imaginations of twenty-something to thirty-something adult men. Everything from the classic “file cards” (attached to the packaging of G.I. Joe figures) that many a “Joe” fan grew up reading and collecting, to the original bases and vehicles, have myriad Internet forums and eBay listings, proving G.I. Joe’s pulse is stronger than indexes can measure. In the summer of 2009, G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, a feature-length film capitalizing on the ever-lasting mythology of a toyline, comic book and cartoon symbiosis will hit the screens. Undoubtedly, the movie will be the first introduction to the story for many, but it will also be the chance for those who grew up with the sounds and visuals of the cartoon’s often inaccurate laser bursts, to no longer have to imagine the scenes in live-action. And surely, through the flick, the toyline will again benefit from its mythology.

Conversation With a Collector: Michael Domaguing

What are your memories of your first G.I. Joe figure?

My first memory was my best friend Bob’s first G.I. Joe–Snow Job. I thought they were cool with the accessories and the amount of detail. Much better than Star Wars figures.

What was the best 3 3/4 inch series collection overall?

I would say the second series with the revised Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow. I mean secret operatives and ninjas, what more could you want in the late ’80s?

How did you feel about the Hasbro marketing of special edition teams like “Night Force” and other such sub-collections that re-imagined some famed “Joe” characters in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s?

I thought it was Hasbro’s version of “Jumping the Shark.” I mean, creating a tie-in with Street Fighter and the environment. I thought that was the end of the product.

Most personally significant piece?

1985 Snake Eyes. It is my coolest piece.

Why do you think G.I. Joe has had such a pull over these years and generations of kids?

I think that G.I. Joe is a timeless brand with everyone. Since W.W.II, kids have had an infatuation with the military. G.I. Joe has enabled [them] to tap into the infatuation as well as modernize them with the backstory and accessories.

Any thoughts on the 25th anniversary collection?

I think any time when you can bring back a childhood memory with more details…the better.

Flint and Lady Jay or Scarlett and Duke? Which was a couple and which were just flirting?

According to the Marvel Comics, Scarlett is dating Snake Eyes, not Duke. Flint and Lady Jaye were dating.

The cost of properly maintaining your collection?

Approximately a couple thousand dollars and hours of love.

Are there any pieces that took a long time to obtain?

Argentinian Snake Eyes. I had [to] visit a recent divorced guy in South Orange County. I brought my overly protective roommate for backup, and an excuse to escape his over-talkativeness.

Is there a G.I. Joe “Holy Grail” item?

1984 Carded Snake Eyes.

Any personal significance in the G.I. Joe universe being a multicultural and gender equal environment?

I think that is always important since this is “reality.” I think it allowed many people to relate to the G.I. Joe line.

Hands down, most awesome vehicle?

Either the Skyhawk or the Sky Striker (F-14 Tomcat).

When you were young, did you also notice that no one ever died or hit their non-machine targets in the cartoon “Joe” universe?

I did notice, but there were some deaths in the G.I. Joe movie. I think someone died. I do know in the comic book Doc and Quick-Kick died.

Why is Destro’s face made of metal but I still see his facial expressions?

Because he is a baller and can afford the most expensive facial surgery…